惠主机
Kuroit在美国洛杉矶设有数据中心，并提供相应的VPS解决方案，提供高达10Gbps上行链路带宽，免费160Gbps+DDoS防护，这个看起来好像还不错，那么实际情况究竟怎么样？
在本文中，小编将对Kuroit洛杉矶VPS进行测评，主要包括硬件配置和网络访问情况，从而确定能否满足我们的使用需求。如果你准备选购Kuroit洛杉矶VPS，那么不妨来看看，当然测试数据仅供参考。
据了解，Kuroit洛杉矶VPS采用KVM虚拟化，Intel Xeon E5 CPU、DDR4 RAM，默认1Gbps带宽，可付费升级至10Gbps，月付价格3.9美元起，具体方案配置如下所示：
| 方案 | CPU | 内存 | 硬盘 | 流量/带宽 | 租用价格 | 购买地址 |
| AVA-1 | 1核心 | 1GB | 15GB SSD | 1.0TB/1Gbps | 3.90美元/月 | 点此购买 |
| AVA-2 | 1核心 | 2GB | 25GB SSD | 2.0TB/1Gbps | 6.49美元/月 | 点此购买 |
| AVA-3 | 2核心 | 4GB | 50GB SSD | 3.0TB/1Gbps | 12.95美元/月 | 点此购买 |
| AVA-4 | 3核心 | 6GB | 75GB SSD | 4.0TB/1Gbps | 19.48美元/月 | 点此购买 |
| AVA-5 | 4核心 | 8GB | 100GB SSD | 5.0TB/1Gbps | 25.97美元/月 | 点此购买 |
| AVA-6 | 6核心 | 12GB | 150GB SSD | 6.0TB/1Gbps | 38.95美元/月 | 点此购买 |
| AVA-7 | 8核心 | 16GB | 200GB SSD | 7.0TB/1Gbps | 51.94美元/月 | 点此购买 |
| AVA-8 | 16核心 | 32GB | 400GB SSD | 8.0TB/1Gbps | 103.88美元/月 | 点此购买 |
- 默认支持1个IPv4地址
测试方案配置：E5-2690 v4 CPU、2GB内存、共享1Gbps带宽，IP归属洛杉矶，硬盘I/O读写性能一般：
Version : v2024.07.11
Global Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
Region Speedtest : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz
CPU Cores : 1 @ 2599.996 MHz
CPU Cache : 35840 KB
AES-NI : Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : Enabled
Total Disk : 19.3 GB (6.9 GB Used)
Total RAM : 1.9 GB (687.6 MB Used)
System uptime : 11 days, 2 hour 24 min
Load average : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
OS : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 5.15.0-76-generic
Virtualization : KVM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary Network : IPv6
ISP : 1GSERVERS, LLC
ASN : AS14315 1GSERVERS, LLC
Host : Kuroit Limited
Location : Los Angeles, United States
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 150.56 MB/s (37.6k) | 1.32 GB/s (20.7k)
Write | 150.96 MB/s (37.7k) | 1.33 GB/s (20.8k)
Total | 301.53 MB/s (75.3k) | 2.65 GB/s (41.5k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.55 GB/s (3.0k) | 1.52 GB/s (1.4k)
Write | 1.63 GB/s (3.1k) | 1.62 GB/s (1.5k)
Total | 3.18 GB/s (6.2k) | 3.15 GB/s (3.0k)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
Provider Location (Link) Send Speed Recv Speed Ping
Clouvider London, UK (10G) 3.20 Gbits/sec 4.48 Gbits/sec 4.07 ms
Scaleway Paris, FR (10G) 1.82 Gbits/sec 1.45 Gbits/sec 15.1 ms
NovoServe North Holland, NL (40G) 1.86 Gbits/sec 4.18 Gbits/sec 9.34 ms
Uztelecom Tashkent, UZ (10G) 1.26 Gbits/sec 653 Mbits/sec 98.9 ms
Clouvider NYC, NY, US (10G) 1.02 Gbits/sec 1.07 Gbits/sec 74.4 ms
Clouvider Dallas, TX, US (10G) 748 Mbits/sec 663 Mbits/sec 110 ms
Clouvider Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) 797 Mbits/sec 325 Mbits/sec 135 ms
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 691
Multi Core | 708
以下是国内部分节点上传和下行带宽测试结果：
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 6317.74 Mbps 4899.12 Mbps 0.84 ms Hongkong CN 300.88 Mbps 2255.83 Mbps 205.07 ms Hongkong CN 539.43 Mbps 2674.89 Mbps 152.61 ms Shanghai CT 5.85 Mbps 3202.08 Mbps 170.35 ms Hefei CT 242.36 Mbps 2143.67 Mbps 150.90 ms Jiangsu CT 25.65 Mbps 3014.98 Mbps 172.04 ms Shanghai CU 280.14 Mbps 1.42 Mbps 249.67 ms HuNan CU 521.64 Mbps 823.56 Mbps 167.26 ms Gansu CM 322.05 Mbps 1823.07 Mbps 230.62 ms Guangxi CM 399.88 Mbps 2428.66 Mbps 200.69 ms Fuzhou CM 393.06 Mbps 2640.61 Mbps 192.89 ms
国内部分地区ping延迟测试，平均延迟在169ms的样子，这个延迟还算是马马虎虎吧：
联通去程路由节点测试，联通AS4837直连日本NTT线路，然后然转cogentco网络到达洛杉矶机房：
联通回程路由节点，从机房出来走zayo网络，在洛杉矶节点直连联通AS4837线路回来：
traceroute to 61.148.148.105 (61.148.148.105), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 31.216.59.2 (31.216.59.2) 0.511 ms 0.485 ms 0.467 ms 2 gsl-1.core1.lax1.as931.net (5.252.164.116) 0.455 ms 0.442 ms 0.469 ms 3 206.148.25.86 (206.148.25.86) 0.447 ms 0.444 ms 0.443 ms 4 ca-3-1-c3.ter1.lax12.us.zip.zayo.com (64.124.129.52) 0.515 ms 0.549 ms 0.577 ms 5 * * * 6 ae22.er1.lax20.us.zip.zayo.com (64.125.25.11) 0.974 ms 0.676 ms 0.692 ms 7 zayo-cu.er1.lax20.us.zip.zayo.com (208.184.12.147) 147.592 ms 147.640 ms 147.820 ms 8 * * * 9 219.158.10.77 (219.158.10.77) 150.725 ms 150.722 ms 150.730 ms 10 * * * 11 125.33.186.30 (125.33.186.30) 150.573 ms * 61.149.203.122 (61.149.203.122) 152.262 ms 12 61.148.148.105 (61.148.148.105) 151.931 ms 152.279 ms 151.261 ms
移动去程路由节点，移动CMI直连圣何塞节点，然后转cogentco网络到达洛杉矶机房：
移动回程路由节点测试，从洛杉矶节点走移动CMI直连香港，然后在回到内地：
traceroute to 221.183.39.133 (221.183.39.133), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 31.216.59.2 (31.216.59.2) 0.277 ms 0.509 ms 0.478 ms 2 e50-1.cr1a.1200w.lax7.us.917.as (199.119.64.72) 0.618 ms 0.629 ms 0.632 ms 3 p90-1.cr2a.csla2.lax2.us.917.as (199.119.64.54) 0.543 ms 0.569 ms 0.574 ms 4 po100.cr1a.csla2.lax2.us.917.as (199.119.64.200) 0.617 ms 0.629 ms 0.649 ms 5 p77-3533a.cr1a.csla2.lax2.us.917.as (84.17.33.26) 0.578 ms 0.604 ms 0.613 ms 6 ix-be-21.ecore1.lvw-losangeles.as6453.net (66.110.59.160) 0.826 ms 8 207.45.219.131 (207.45.219.131) 1.435 ms 1.303 ms 1.321 ms 9 223.120.6.17 (223.120.6.17) 1.082 ms 1.069 ms 1.163 ms 10 223.120.12.106 (223.120.12.106) 192.969 ms * 193.307 ms 11 221.183.55.82 (221.183.55.82) 176.473 ms 176.024 ms 175.920 ms 12 221.183.92.21 (221.183.92.21) 176.010 ms * 176.485 ms 13 221.183.89.242 (221.183.89.242) 176.112 ms 176.224 ms * 14 221.183.39.133 (221.183.39.133) 175.217 ms 174.645 ms 177.293 ms
电信去程路由节点测试，电信163骨干网直连日本东京节点，然后转ntt线路对接cogentco到达洛杉矶机房：
电信回程路由节点，从机房出来，在洛杉矶节点走163骨干网回到国内：
traceroute to 119.147.86.35 (119.147.86.35), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 31.216.59.2 (31.216.59.2) 0.531 ms 0.438 ms 0.417 ms 2 e50-1.cr1a.1200w.lax7.us.917.as (199.119.64.72) 0.590 ms 0.610 ms 0.648 ms 3 p90-1.cr2a.csla2.lax2.us.917.as (199.119.64.54) 0.548 ms 0.614 ms 0.615 ms 4 po100.cr1a.csla2.lax2.us.917.as (199.119.64.200) 0.582 ms 0.630 ms 0.660 ms 5 p77-3533a.cr1a.csla2.lax2.us.917.as (84.17.33.26) 0.661 ms p77-3534b.cr1a.csla2.lax2.us.917.as (84.17.33.28) 6 ix-hge-0-0-0-18.ecore2.lvw-losangeles.as6453.net (64.86.252.169) 1.005 ms 0.865 ms 7 * * * 8 207.45.219.135 (207.45.219.135) 13.213 ms 13.210 ms 13.210 ms 9 202.97.99.217 (202.97.99.217) 156.345 ms 156.392 ms 156.381 ms 10 202.97.66.26 (202.97.66.26) 156.143 ms 202.97.12.26 (202.97.12.26) 156.484 ms 202.97.65.94 (202.97.65.94) 156.482 ms 11 * 202.97.93.46 (202.97.93.46) 157.182 ms * 12 119.147.220.74 (119.147.220.74) 160.385 ms 119.147.220.126 (119.147.220.126) 160.350 ms * 13 * * * 14 183.36.43.150 (183.36.43.150) 161.457 ms * * 15 * * * 16 119.147.86.35 (119.147.86.35) 159.288 ms 159.794 ms 159.658 ms
部分跨域流媒体解锁支持测试（支持tiktok）：
小结
以上就是关于Kuroit洛杉矶VPS大致测评情况，可以看出硬件配置一般，勉强说的过去，好在母鸡负载不高。在网络方面，带宽资源给的非常足，但三大骨干网到国内并非优化线路，所以访问延迟略高，如果对访问速度要求比较高，则需要慎重考虑。
在流媒体解锁方面还可以，常见的基本上都可以搞定。所以，小编建议最好是针对欧美地区的访客选用，这样体验感会比较好。
